Timeline Blog

Canvy Facebook WhatsApp social networks

The Facebook Messenger story – a (perhaps dangerous) success

Similar Web released a study that reveals the most popular global messaging apps in the last couple of years. The study, as analyzed by express.co.uk, clearly captures the way Facebook Messenger superseded WhatsApp in 2017, compared to 2016. Granted, the current version of Messenger launched in April 2015. It went from 600 million users initially, to 9 00 million in June 2016, 1 billion in July 2016, and 1.2 billion in April 2017.

Just as a list, here you may see the Top Google Play apps in the Communication section, as listed by the same SimilarWeb. The top two positions are similar to the study quoted by the UK publication.

What is the dangerous part in Messenger’s success?

Going back to 2016, we may well remember how Facebook forced its users to download the Messenger app, separating Messenger from their network. The move qualified as “hostile” at the time – and the users were annoyed.

However, we are now looking at an app that beat the install-at-your-free-will WhatsApp – and what does this tell us? That a forceful move is ignor-able, if time and numbers vouch for a successful outcome.

The company, or any other company could replay the same technique in theory. The results d not seem to penalize the practice in any way.

What would the practice be described as? Well, splitting one product that has been validated by the market and ensuring a similar success of the secondary project – in a move that removes the users from the control board.

The peoples’ network – the capital of any communication app

The above example was possible due to the fact that Facebook made sure they have a most valuable capital, before making their move. The people that formed their social network already established connections and cared about them. Letting go was unlikely. Facebook capitalized on this reality, which is a customary practice with this brand.

Of course, taking into account that each move that the users dislike brings about a lot of comments about how Facebook does not consider the users’ wishes, the levels of discontent seem to raise. Somewhere along the line there should be a tipping point. Some wonder, others plainly hope for this to materialize – because this approach is, in fact, offensive.

Its value of precedent makes the entire issue even more important. Facebook has plans for free, ubiquitous Internet. Facebook – the social network, has the tagline “It’s free and always will be”. This is an important factor that attracted the huge numbers of users. The users that are now capital for one very important brand. The users that now have to ignore their pride and options at each questionable change made by the network. Because it’s free and because they still want to keep in touch with their peers.

Take this hidden price and shift it at the Internet’s level…

…and you get an arguable lack of freedom of choice. Just how much are you willing to give up because you want to be in the loop? Just how much is it worth giving up in exchange for freebies?

The big lurking issue beneath the free Internet is lack of net neutrality. You surely know the debate – fast and slow lane Internet, selected information, the bigger player gets to decide what goes on where.

The problem with this kind of fight is that it never happened. Without the influencers explaining the importance of keeping your freedom of choice, the general noise covered the incident. What never happened remains just a memory, if that. The mechanism was tested and it worked in favor of Facebook.

This proves the point that the leading-edge tech companies have the authority, build upon years of customer relationships and upon free features that dazzle the public, of imposing their point of view over the better reason or over the preferences of their audience.

Is this an idea we are comfortable with?

Unsettling future perspectives

Some acknowledge that we are not there yet, but we might be heading straight into a society of uniformity. Uniformity would not exclude variety – just think of how automation segments users into categories. You wisely keep categories, yet you feed the same message to one and all – to each in its personalized, suitable manner.

Such an image surely describes a simplified way of getting things through, but it definitely does not describe modern, educated communication. Communication as we’ve grown to understand it, means getting things back and forth, perhaps disagreeing, confronting opposite ideas. The winner is not pre-decided in real communication. If it would be, then why bother with just the show?

Or are we there yet, and we just expect the show? Perhaps Facebook just put the Messenger move too bluntly, while other brands still go through the slow-dance steps of announcing, testing, taking feedback into consideration – and finally going through with the initial decision, regardless of what users want. This way, they have something to show in the line of “at least making an effort”.

 

Canvy MWC 2018

February unleashes MWC 2018, and the mobile brands are set to amaze us once more

…or at least that’s what the public expects from the 900+ exhibitors (as listed here).

The dedicated online media already started covering this focal topic, and the latest developments are yet to come. You can browse the latest TechCrunch feature on what to look forward to at this year’s edition of the Mobile World Congress or search for the specific string of news as covered by your favorite online publication. You probably won’t be disappointed.

 

What caught our eye about this year’s MWC

On a short browsing session today we’ve noticed how LG’s Vision AI managed to make the trending news. Well, tbh, some of the members of our team do have a soft spot for the latest generation LG products. Nevertheless, the fact that a suite of AI technologies aiming to conquer the hearts of mobile fans is really raising an interest illustrates that the market has a certain amount of expectations in this direction. Regardless of the brand, the company that will genuinely be capable of answering these expectations gets the benefit of breaking the ice. Of course, the functionalities should be extremely practical or even truly amazing, otherwise we are back to the late 70s almanac effect.

What we mean to say with this is that progress is a fickle thing. Prototypes and projective stories on progress are one thing, while the viable commercial products and the feel of the materialized concepts can easily disappoint. The market hunger for truly impressive technologies does not make for the said technologies.

Now, the features prepared by LG, as introduced here do not seem as exciting as one would have thought. While AI’s possibilities are infinite, using them to recommend the best photo shooting mode or to voice-control the smartphone seems way under the expectations.

 

Other brands also hint at a couple of potentially interesting unveiling-s

Launching a new wireless charger, coming up with a new, improved DeX and presenting the Galaxy S9 and S9+ flagships should be alluring enough for Samsung’s fans. You may explore more details on this topic here.

IDEMIA made a few waves with its Augmented Identity solutions. The target audience here is industry level, and the main concerned areas would be the Financial, Telecom, Identity, Public Security and IoT.

Huawei keeps its followers busy with developments on the 5G line of action, and places its AI bets in the cloud, more precisely its All-Cloud intelligent networks infrastructure.

Of course, the novelties will have in mind various areas and different financial possibilities – for example Archos will showcase 3 budget phones. The thing is not without importance, since the idea of ubiquitous Internet is still on the table, and this means all individuals should afford Internet access, be it on a budget device or on a high-end one.

Between promises and delivery

Since it’s already been a couple of years since the tech companies circulate bold concepts in the context of the IoT, and in general, of the new tech conjecture, we may well notice the way things look a bit toned down. This is partly due to the fact that these bold concepts have had time to fail, or simply not deliver. Once this happened with flexible phones, transparent screens or smart glasses, the enthusiasm that surrounded the possible materialization of these bright ideas is bound to lose some of its oomph.

This does not automatically mean the tech bubble is deflating. It just stands to show the environment is perhaps maturing, and the viable ideas separate themselves from the less possible ones. We’ll just have to see what real surprises tech brands do have in store for their customers.

 

 

Canvy Intel news Vaunt

Is the smartest design inconspicuous? Intel seems to think so

You must have surely heard by now of the smart glasses’ odyssey. The wearable computer glasses have gone through a few versions – and the issue of comfort shared an equal part with the tech issue, in what keeping the product from mass commercialization is concerned.

The most well-known attempt comes from Google. The Google Glass went through several proofs of concept (PoC), then it became the Aura Project, aiming niche markets (healthcare, corporate). It gradually faded out of the limelight.

The entire experience prompted out that unusual, uncomfortable head gear cannot lead to success. VR headsets represent a similar case.

 

Intel’s attempt to turn the tables

Intel decided to avoid making the same mistakes as mentioned above. Their smart glasses look inconspicuous, according to online media reports. The prototype is called Vaunt, and allegedly mimics the usual pair of plastic glasses one may find at any optometrist.

The Vaunt can reflect holographic images on the user’s retina, include Bluetooth connectivity, and are able to send discreet notifications to their user. The matter of contextual, integrated notification is one focal point of this new piece of technology, whilst the software that backs it up remains a secret for the moment.

While Slate underlines the possible connection between Intel’s negative chipset security flaws attention and this new gadget – as in suggesting that the company may have used this project to distract people from the less flattering question of flawed chipsets, the product is nevertheless interesting.

Regardless of whether Intel will decide to commercialize the Vault or not, it sure has set a precedent.

 

What if the bold new technology were inconspicuous?

Let’s imagine the tech gear of the future looking just as our current objects look like, only having an advanced tech twist hidden beneath a normal looking surface.

This would surely be another way to go, in opposition with in-your-eyes technology, making a loud statement that it should prevail in our lives.

An IoT-connected, highly automatized household could, for example, look just like any other house, unraveling its technological potential only per request.

We could integrate efficient technology in a completely environment-friendly landscape, aiming for health, visually-pleasing greenery and sustainability.

Of course, the degree of maturity involved in taking such an approach is way higher than the actual stage of societal progress seems to involve. But we can always remain optimistic.

If by the time we’ve grown out of the tech-enthusiasts’ adolescence we are basking in, there will be enough of a planet for us to steer back towards an eco-compatible environment, inconspicuous technology might be the only way to go.

In the meantime, you may take a look at the Vaunt, on this Verge hands-on video:

Canvy Google HTC brands humanizing trends

Humanizing brands – what does it mean in our age?

On the background of the news concerning the Google acquisition of certain HTC employees for a sum of $11 billion in cash, as captured by ZDNet, we wondered what does the public associate brands with  – nowadays.

The individual-behind-the brand is an obsolete trend. We remember the Steve Jobs cult, yet most of the customers of the same company today could hardly pin the current Apple CEO. A few amends can be made to this conclusion, however, since Facebook definitely means Zuckerberg, Virgin Group means Richard Branson and Tesla means Elon Musk.

When we see a person as being the brand, as in determining the fundamental decisions that steer a brand in what its products and societal impact mean, we’ve humanized the brand. All its employees and values are infused by the characteristics we associate with the one person that IS the brand.

However, is this just a perception, or does it have a nugget of truth in it?

 

The value of brand humanization

Profits. Influence. Isn’t that the core of commerce? These apparently come easier when instead of random clients, brands have loyal customers or even absolute fans. OK, let’s settle for the middle area of loyal customers – fans, although extremely in fashion for decades, are in fact a bit more. The amount of emotion involved in being a fan makes the entire thing a bit extreme, and in any serious study, the extremes are not taken into consideration.

*For those who enjoy video materials, here’s an Inc video on the value of brand humanization subject.

The process starts from the inside. As the brand owners personalize and humanize its presence, by attributing “character traits – likes, dislikes, mannerisms and a dialect” to it, and by positioning their campaigns “in and around these traits”, they induce the same perception to their target audience.

The process might take time, but it sure pays off in the end. There are recipes on how to approach this whole humanize-your-brand business. Big companies invest a lot of resources into it, smaller companies strike gold when they manage to infuse it on a more restrained budget.

The baseline – it’s not easy. Some specialize in it, others simply make the brand in their likeness. And yes, it is mostly about perception.

 

When the branding story parts with reality

Of course, all stories benefit or suffer from this phenomenon. Yet there is digression and digression. There are brands that have fallen due to being exposed as being the exact opposite of their official story. One cannot pretend to be ethical, for example, while in fact, not being – or can they?

Well, to put it bluntly, keeping up appearances works as long as no unwanted exposure turns the fans into haters. The game is a dangerous, especially when the reality does not at least partially keep up with the official image.

There are examples when the brand fans believe what they were led into believing, and ultimately contribute to fueling the image they want to be true. For example, Android and iOS are competitors, yet the big tech companies beneath these operating systems are in fact working together. Due to the patent system, one company actually gains when a product of the “adversary” is bought. Now, in a humanized version, would we see them as frenemies, as fair-play competitors, or as being in cahoots?

The same with merging, acquisitions and important personnel shifts – when actual humans associated with one brand go to a completely different company. We assume these former employees are imbued with the company values, and in turn the company values reside in each such employee. So, what happens when changes occur?

 

Keeping brand-related likes and dislikes genuine…

Snatching the approval of the potential audience is a game with high stakes. With Machine earning, AI, algorithms and big data involved, the customer is like an ancient king, maneuvered by clever, calculated decision makers.

However, even the turbulent history of humanity managed to have a few wise kings. Making educated choices, reaching a higher level of likes and dislikes, a level where we are emotional,, but also rational – here’s a possible way of actually being in charge as customers.

By supporting the brands which fake it less, and sanctioning the changes that we don’t like, we contribute as customers to a better future. Of course, we have to really understand what the values worth fighting for are, as well as the deep (yet amazingly prone to invisibility) link between what surrounds us and our own choices.

125 computer-security-padlock-hacker-163009

Get the best out of modern cybersecurity, don’t let it get the best out of you

Alphabet, Google’s parent company, just launched its own cyber-security project, entitled Chronicle. The project targets enterprises and aims to help such customers better manage their own security.

The online media debate tackles the fact that, the Chronicle project resembles other countless similar projects. It hasn’t been disclosed so far what makes this particular project relevant and outstanding in the cyber-security environment. Gizmodo, for example, wonders what exactly qualifies as moonshot about this entire endeavor, besides being associated with Google, that is.

 

Modern cyber vulnerabilities call for modern cyber-security

 

Of course, we have a Captain Obvious thing here. Who does not know this in our day and age?  Well, when you juxtapose this with the fact that modern cyber-security is still in the making, perhaps we start getting the image of a current dilemma.

Most companies are aware of the IoT dawning upon their operations. The decision makers have moved forward to implement the necessary hardware and software changes. Yet the IoT comes along with cyber-vulnerabilities like never before, some of which have already been acted out.

It’s only logical that ubiquitous connectivity can be reversed into ubiquitous hacking, and malicious parties taking control of the companies’ networks. The cyber-security experts work continually towards improving the means of protection, yet sometimes it seems that the enemy manages to be ahead of them.

This fluctuating gap between the protectors and the attackers in cyber-security leaves room for a lot of misrepresentation, fuelled by the enterprises’ real and deeply rooted concern for their critical and sensitive data.

There are no standardized solutions, there are ambiguous sets of best practice measures, and there are quite a lot brands and branded cyber-security projects. The field is crowded, and there is a lot of noise – not at all the best atmosphere for encouraging straight thinking.

 

Get the best out of modern cyber-security

 

The online media means any piece of news travels fast and has a potentially global reach. Keep updated on the trajectory of the leading brands in cyber-security. As a CIO person, even as a CEO, the latest in cyber-security is now mandatory, not optional. At least a weekly update on what happened to notable importance is well advised.

This way you have a chance of learning from the mistakes of others, instead of repeating these mistakes. Also, when approached with various offers, it is easier to discern the actually possible/doable from the mass of wishful thinking you can be presented with by a bold, yet dubiously trustful specialized brand.

 

Now, the leading cyber-security brands rarely venture in making promises they cannot sustain. Reliability and consistency is part of being successful on the market for a long time. However, when their solutions seem similar, an educated partner of discussion from your company can go through the process of understanding what makes one potential partner stand out against the others.

 

In other words, you have to make the first step, and in order to do so (and be a solid discussion partner in cyber-security matters), you need a background, a pool of thematic general knowledge. There is no universal recipe for how to keep informed on the most important matters, but it is mandatory that you do so.

 

Don’t let it modern cyber-security get the best out of you

 

…especially that, as we’ve mentioned, there is no official modern cyber-security operations set, but rather a work-in-progress phenomenon.

In conclusion, the iterations that exude complete self-confidence and reassure you that your operations are completely protected in any eventuality – not valid.

A cyber-security partner that guarantees virtually nothing, because, well, it’s a big bad world and an infinity of threats out there – also to avoid.

The key is in the previous experience, in the continuous market presence, combined with a solid agreement – look for relevant certifications, find out whether your industry’s unique considerations are provided for and so on.

It takes patience and attention, but it pays off in the end. As the representative of a company or as a privacy-concerned individual, in this field is better to leave the enthusiastic attitude at the door, and poke into each detail, calmly and in the most concerned and calculated manner – before selecting your partner.

Canvy communication

Communication should be flawless, except sometimes it isn’t, but it makes up by being funny

Local and global habits and etiquette have a way of growing on people. We all want to belong, to smooth relations and interactions, and to get one step closer to our goals by playing by the rules. Or at least by playing by those rules that are easier to abide.

A certain appearance, a way of addressing the others, paying attention to various embedded habits – and one becomes a sleek member of the (business/creative/domestic) community that makes up one’s environment.

Of course, such an intended compliance doesn’t always go as planned – and sometimes it’s for the better.

Minor miscommunications can break the ice

Due to the fact that an anticipated course of events generally represents our comfort zone, when things go as planned, all you will see of one person is all they desire to be seen. Some have histrionic talents are not at all what you see of them when the expected scenario goes on unhindered. Some have simply learned to go through the moves – and perhaps their job doesn’t even require more than this for everything to be OK.

Well, only when the unexpected is at work you can get to the second level of this game. Of course, some have backups for this too, and they just employ yet another role for themselves – “starring in the Mayhem movie” this time.

But it may well happen that unpredictable things crack the shell of people and they end up communicating for real, or even sharing meaningful connections. Perhaps a question was misheard, a meeting was postponed or wrongfully scheduled – that kind of things.

Of course, minor is minor, and sometimes interpersonal or intercultural differences are so impactful that the results are borderline funny, yet more like disastrous.  This is an article on this subject, where you may find out how some of the famous international brands ended up marketing their products in hilarious, even offensive ways by mistake.

Just laugh the embarrassment away

If the previous communication you had with someone just lead to confusion or to a situation you would have rather avoided, don’t make it worse by remaining stuck in a state of embarrassment and lack of creativity.

We are all humans after all, and humor is essential to our survival – it keeps the mind fresh and boosts happiness. Just see the things from outside, take a deep breath, think of how everybody went through similar stuff many a times, and, if possible, move on with a wisecrack and a nice joke.

Of course, managing carefully your appointments, your communications and your less inspirational moments is a thing to never give up a priori. We always strive to be the best version of us, but it is very important to accept our real version – and make a bit of fun about it, if necessary.

Just look at this funny website and have a couple of refreshing laughs – while, if a native English speaker, you recap the foreign languages you know well enough to avoid being “lost in translation”. Have a nice week!

Canvy CES 2018 connectivity laptop smartphone Android

Does your smartphone limit your great ideas sometimes? Connecting it to your PC is the next step, it seems…

The Las Vegas annual technology trade show is soon to begin (it takes place 9 to 12 January), and word of the most interesting tech novelties is already all over the Internet. The Consumer Electronics Show marked a tradition of half a century last year, and surely the products exposed nowadays don’t resemble those that amazed people back in 1967.

Since we are all about connectivity, out of the various pieces of news related to CES 2018, we chose to focus this time on the Dell PC-smartphone integration software, the richest in feature of its kind so far. Let’s explore the underlying implications a bit.

A possible laptop revival

The purpose of Dell Mobile Connect is out in the open, starting with its denomination. The software allows “Android and iOS users to make calls, send texts, get notifications, and interact with all of their favorite mobile apps straight from their PC screen.” Of course, the main scenario considers people at work, who, while employing this functionality, would reduce unnecessary distractions, without getting disconnected.

This move has in its background the results of specialized studies, showing that traditional devices lose ground when confronted with the almighty portable, connected and multifunctional smartphone. Since our mobiles now are gateways to being in the loop and integrated in various types of virtual communities, when it comes to choosing between them and laptops, for example, we are reluctant to take a break from the phones, to say the least.

The concept behind this software embodies the “why choose, when you can have both?” motto. It’s pretty neat and straightforward, and provided it works well and it’s currently alone in a niche, it should be a hit.

Acknowledging how the contemporaneous workforce looks like

There we have it – a product that acknowledges the modern way of working. We are always on, ever since smartphones gained traction. Ignoring this fact or trying to ban it is nothing more than denial. As with other powerful digital era trends, the sooner we admit the reality of it and integrate it in a productive manner in our mainstream habits, the better.

The Mobile Connect software (or for that matter, other similar concept products) also help users overcome one inconvenient in smartphones, respectively the reduced screen size. This imperfection was previously tackled with phablets, yet, since it makes the devices harder to carry around, conceal or put in a normal sized pocket, this attempt is being pushed back.

Also, smartphones do suffer from an amazing ineptitude when it comes to connectivity – you need dedicated drives & software, depending on the model, and the compatibility remains reduced. The files are in a different format, one cannot perform operations easily with them even through the computer installed dashboards, and the processes involved are mainly frustrating. Although details on the software remain to emerge, it is plausible that the smartphone mirroring function will cover the aspects mentioned above.

 A step towards the consumer computer systems of the future

In many technology fields, segmentation is a progress killer. All the bright new viable concepts end up drowning in a pool of compatibility settings, third-party selections and roadblocks. We have to face hardware and software borders everywhere, and ubiquitous connectivity id hindered by a state of facts that still has a long way to go until changing for the better.

In a way, the situation is understandable, since the leading tech producers do compete with each other. It’s simply the way the market works. Yet the changes in dynamic push for even more changes. The direction is a bit weird – meaning that, if in the past some social revolutions were driven by philosophical and others by industrial breakthroughs, nowadays the change inducers are mainly technological. Their implications may not even be fully understood by their makers themselves, as it was the case with other huge inventions humankind prides itself with. Nevertheless, the pressures are big, and one direction for them is to unify hardware and software standards, in order to smooth out the global connectivity’s path.

Therefore, allowing your laptops to connect with both iOS and Android smartphones is a step in the right direction. We shall see its merits and perhaps its limitations as the users provide pertinent feedback – we can only wait for this.

canvy, gamification, games, trending

Is the gamification trend counter-efficient?

While gamification translates as employing “game-based  mechanics,  aesthetics  and  game  thinking  to  engage people,  motivate  action,  promote  learning,  and  solve  problems” (see the 1st hyperlink below), in fields previously characterized by a non-game structures and an overall seriousness, this trend is catching on in the tech world, as well as in education and business.

The gamification hype

“If it’s games they like, let’s give them games” – this seems to be the motto guiding the adoption of game-like structures in various fields. Of course, learning through play it’s a century old truth. But the yesteryear play that allowed youngsters to mimic life and thus enhance and exercise their skills was a full three-dimensional type of exercise. Nowadays we play games that put our imagination within different type of boundaries, whilst greatly remaining different from the reality in which we breathe, live and interact. Furthermore, the gamification that’s been imported into the workplace, education, training or business operations is derived from video games, since this might well be the singular trigger for interest when dealing with the digital generation.

The gamification hype doesn’t ask questions – businesses adopt and employ gamification because it’s trendy and because it delivers short-term results. Once the recipients of gamified products and programs respond to this approach, the psychological downsizes to this process seem to concern almost no one.

Games teach us something, but there is a price

 Of course, there is a wide variety of games, even inside the video game genre. Strategy, fight, survival, creative, click and play, open world and so on, each subgenre implies a different set of rules and develops certain skills and thinking abilities.

There are learning games and there are escapist games. The truth nobody wants to hear is that all games are escapist – we turn our back to immediate reality and immerse ourselves as players in a fantasy world where we live the illusion of our actions being constructive or important. To a certain extent, they are. Games perpetuate a cause and effect dynamic that is not always met by reality, and many players do not concern themselves with the difference between a regulated, enclosed environment and the vastness of reality, nor with the difference of rhythm between a video game and life, where often the slow pace and the effort beneath each action predominate.

Games and gamified processes teach us what they have been destined to teach us. They deliver a simplified, clear experience that stands in opposition with the chaotic way life unravels. Many a time those who have played more games that lived challenging life situations find it hard to process complex situations. The tendency to simplify things and reduce multi-layered situations to their closes flat counterpart does come out of being too familiar with game-based dynamics.

As studies have noted, games perpetuate the winner philosophy – the learning value of failing lacks or is strongly neglected, and thus they promote a distorted perception of the world.

Are we strong enough to remember the rules of the biggest game of all?

To paraphrase Lewis Carroll “life, what is it but a game?” While it may surely be considered so, the rules of this game are partly mysterious and (fortunately) yet elusive. We may wish to simply it all, and make it all more understandable – but it hardly works this way.

Gamification highly serves the technology hype, as well as humanity’s dreams of automation and robotics. Any device stands the possibility of being programmed to understand the rules of a game and apply these rules in order to win. We are already making the first steps to introduce gamification in talent assessment, in education, and companies enthrall their employees by bringing games into the workplace.

We are thus encouraged to remain or to become again kids, eager to express ourselves, to have fun, to go for the immediate advantage.

To go back to literature, perhaps it would be useful to read or re-read Lord of the Flies – in a world of kids, who will be humane, kind and wise?

The biggest game of all has different rules, and it still awaits for us to be adults, mature and to have gained the degree of understanding and knowledge to be able to play it. In life, true victory is a victory for many, not just for one. Winning means turning your opponents around, perhaps changing our own position to meet in the middle. Finding out our purpose, communicating, sharing, feeling that we still have a soul – such are the victories of this intense, dynamic, trying and challenging “game”.

Meanwhile, in Gamelandia…

The online news is topped by game-related news, such as the one about the French start-up Blade bringing their cloud game service to the U.S, or the Mad Catz manufacturers resurfacing soon at CES 2018. Millions hold their breath when reading about their favorite video game latest addition, version or release, in a disproportionate effusion of sentiments.

As an old-fashioned teacher would say “first do your chores, then play”. But at a global level our chores are long forgotten, while our play comes first, or at least its two-dimensional or three-dimensional replica does.

Google ArCore AR Canvy Team

ARCore SDK to replace Tango, rebranding will follow

Google announced its decision to end the support for its famous Project Tango on March 2018. Their alternative is ARCore, a new SDK that does not need additional hardware, thus making the AR adoption easier. Since Google Tango required for extra sensors to be added to the devices, in order to function, the hardware producers were reluctant, therefore the company reoriented its efforts towards a different technology. ARCore’s tagline is “Transform the future of work and play at Android scale”.

You may explore ARCore in detail here, by browsing the supported development environments, as well as the resources Google made available in the presentation of their product. The purpose of ARCore is similar to Project Tango, respectively it provides a multidimensional sense of the surrounding environment, through a motion tracking system that makes use of the smartphone camera. By mapping out the space in a tridimensional way, this technology serves in advanced AR projects (or at least this is what the company promises).

ARCore’s competitor is Apple’s ARKit, a platform ready for roll-out simultaneously with iOS 11.

net neutrality FCC vote Canvy contact app news

The day the Internet held its breath…

We touched base with the Internet neutrality topic back in September, when we considered ISP blocking and what it means. We also mentioned the fight to keep the digital online space as we all know it on our Facebook page. Now all these are about to unravel, once the FCC vote takes place.

 

The global campaign against the vote that might bend net neutrality

The taglines read “it’s time to break the internet” – and influential groups and people call for resistance. Perhaps it seems hard to grasp the full importance of this step – yet those who know better are willing to explain it over and over again. Transforming the online space into a fragmented, multi-lane environment is bad. And once the precedent will be created, this will ripple into global effects. So yes, it concerns every net user in every corner of the world.

The Open Letter addressed to the U. S. Senate Subcommittee comprises a 43 page comment that details all the flaws in the upcoming action, as well as tries to deconstruct the false argumentation employed in supporting ISP manipulation, or, in other words, to present it as a thing that is already taking place, thus minimizing the effects of the impending vote.

“Don’t repeal net neutrality” and “you don’t understand how the Internet works” – here’s some of the most powerful allegations pertaining to the massive campaign that supports net neutrality. Striking mockup illustrations (as the one we captioned) try to make it clear to people how the Internet will look like if the act passes.

 

What can you do?

First, get informed in due time. You still have the liberty to do it – search for your preferred online authors and see what they have to say. Google the matter – browse articles, scan the arguments. Discuss what you discover, exchange ideas, become aware of what it’s going on and of the impact of these events.

In short, what could happen is that “the proposal would undo regulations that prohibit broadband and wireless companies from slowing or blocking access to the internet and banning them from charging internet companies fees to reach their customers faster than competitors”, as CNET explains it.

Secondly, check pages such as this, in order to see how you can help. Express your presence while it still matters.

Hoping to post again in an environment where the online looks the same, and it’s not shredded into multiple pieces with different regimens.